Application of local anesthesia in ophthalmic surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52547/2a2vfe02Keywords:
strabismusAbstract
Introduction: To compare effects of local anesthesia alone and local anesthesia combined with intravenous intensive anesthesia in adult strabismus surgery.
Methods: This study was a prospective study. Forty patients who underwent strabismus surgery at our Hospital were included in study. General information of patients was collected including age, gender, duration of disease, trigeminal prescription, weight, strabismus diagnosis type and other indicators. Patients were numbered according to their admission order, and a computer-generated random number was used to randomly divide 40 patients into two groups: A was operated with local anesthesia alone, and B was operated with local anesthesia + intravenous intensive anesthesia. All patients were operated by same chief ophthalmologist, and all patient data were recorded and collected by one person:
(1) To compare systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, Percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) and incidence of surgical complications such as oculocardiacreflex (OCR), postoperative nausea and vomiting (OCR) at T1, T2, T3 and T4. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and respiratory depression;
(2) To compare pain scores of intraoperative, 2h, 4h and 8h postoperatively;
(3) To compare time required for surgical muscle;
(4) To compare efficiency of surgical treatment of strabismus at 1 day and 1 week after surgery.
Results: 1. General data: There was no difference in age, gender, weight, duration of disease, visual acuity, trigeminal prescription and strabismus diagnosis type.
2. In comparison, there were no statistical differences in blood pressure, heart rate and SpO2 at T1, T2, T3 and T4, but in comparison within groups, differences in blood pressure and heart rate at each time point were significant (P<0.05), while differences in SpO2 were not significant (P>0.05). The results indicated that there was no interaction between time and in changes of blood pressure, heart rate and SpO2, that is, effect of time factors (T1, T2, T3, T4) did not vary (local anesthesia alone versus local anesthesia + intravenous intensive anesthesia). 3, The incidence of intraoperative OCR was higher in A (70%) than B (35%) . The incidence of PONV in B (25%) was higher than A (5%). No respiratory depression occurred. 4, Intraoperative, 2h postoperative and 4h postoperative pain scores in A were higher than B. Although pain scores in A were still slightly higher than B at 8h postoperatively. 5. In A and B, a total of 57 and 61 extraocular muscles were operated on, respectively, and average operating time required for each muscle was greater in A than B. When comparing different surgical methods (posterior migration of external rectus muscle and shortening of internal rectus muscle), average surgical time required per muscle was greater in A than B. Time required for posterior migration of external rectus muscle was shorter than shortening of internal rectus muscle. 6. The efficiency of surgical treatment of strabismus in A and B at 1 day and 1 week after surgery was higher than A (100%) than B (95%).
Conclusion: 1. There was no difference in effects of two anesthesia methods on intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2 and respiratory depression, PONV, and strabismus surgical treatment effect, 2. Local anesthesia combined with intravenous intensive anesthesia is safe and effective in strabismus surgery. Compared with local anesthesia alone, it can not only reduce occurrence of OCR, improve intraoperative and early postoperative analgesia, but also shorten average operating time required for each muscle.
Keywords: strabismus; surgery; anesthesia; dexmedetomidine; sufentanil
Downloads
References
Shi, C., Yuan, J., & Zee, B. (2019). Pain perception of the first eye versus the second eye during phacoemulsification under local anesthesia for patients going through cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2019.
Winder, C. B., LeBlanc, S. J., Haley, D. B., Lissemore, K. D., Godkin, M. A., & Duffield, T. F. (2017). Clinical trial of local anesthetic protocols for acute pain associated with caustic paste disbudding in dairy calves. Journal of dairy science, 100(8), 6429-6441.
Buhren, B. A., Schrumpf, H., Hoff, N. P., Bölke, E., Hilton, S., & Gerber, P. A. (2016). Hyaluronidase: from clinical applications to molecular and cellular mechanisms. European journal of medical research, 21(1), 1-7.
Palte, H. D. (2015). Ophthalmic regional blocks: management, challenges, and solutions. Local and regional anesthesia, 8, 57.
Sinha, R., Sharma, A., Ray, B. R., Chandiran, R., & Chandralekha, C. (2016). Effect of addition of magnesium to local anesthetics for peribulbar block: A prospective randomized double-blind study. Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 10(1), 64.
Rüschen, H., Aravinth, K., Bunce, C., & Bokre, D. (2018). Use of hyaluronidase as an adjunct to local anaesthetic eye blocks to reduce intraoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3).
Ortega, A., Gauna, F., Munoz, D., Oberreuter, G., Breinbauer, H. A., & Carrasco, L. (2019). Music therapy for pain and anxiety management in nasal bone fracture reduction: randomized controlled clinical trial. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 161(4), 613-619.
Enyedi, L. B., Wallace, D. K., & de L Dear, G. (2017). A double-masked randomized trial of postoperative local anesthetic for pain control in pediatric strabismus surgery. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 21(2), 107-111.
Hussain, N., McCartney, C. J. L., Neal, J. M., Chippor, J., Banfield, L., & Abdallah, F. W. (2018). Local anaesthetic-induced myotoxicity in regional anaesthesia: a systematic review and empirical analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 121(4), 822-841.
Thevi, T., & Godinho, M. A. (2016). Trends and complications of local anaesthesia in cataract surgery: an 8-year analysis of 12 992 patients. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 100(12), 1708-1713.
Hafez, M., Fahim, M. R., Abdelhamid, M. H. E., Youssef, M. M. I., & Salem, A. S. (2016). The effect of adding dexmedetomidine to local anesthetic mixture for peribulbar block in vitreoretinal surgeries. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia, 32(4), 573-579.
Neal, J. M., Salinas, F. V., & Choi, D. S. (2016). Local anesthetic-induced myotoxicity after continuous adductor canal block. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 41(6), 723-727.
Jaichandran, V. V., Raman, R., Gella, L., & Sharma, T. (2015). Local anesthetic agents for vitreoretinal surgery: no advantage to mixing solutions. Ophthalmology, 122(5), 1030-1033.
Choi, S., Park, S. G., Bellan, L., Lee, H. H., & Chung, S. K. (2018). Crossover clinical trial of pain relief in cataract surgery. International ophthalmology, 38(3), 1027-1033.
Lathwal, G., Pandit, I. K., Gugnani, N., & Gupta, M. (2015). Efficacy of different precooling agents and topical anesthetics on the pain perception during intraoral injection: a comparative clinical study. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 8(2), 119.
Kirksey, M. A., Haskins, S. C., Cheng, J., & Liu, S. S. (2015). Local anesthetic peripheral nerve block adjuvants for prolongation of analgesia: a systematic qualitative review. PloS one, 10(9), e0137312.
Berry, S., & Ondecko Ligda, K. (2015). Ophthalmic surgery. In Basic Clinical Anesthesia (pp. 483-487). Springer, New York, NY.
Urfalıoğlu, A., Urfalıoğlu, S., & Öksüz, G. (2017). The knowledge of eye physicians on local anesthetic toxicity and intravenous lipid treatment: Questionnaire study. Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 47(6), 320.
Kouba, D. J., LoPiccolo, M. C., Alam, M., Bordeaux, J. S., Cohen, B., Hanke, C. W., ... & Moyano, J. V. (2016). Guidelines for the use of local anesthesia in office-based dermatologic surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 74(6), 1201-1219.
Adinehmehr, L., Shetabi, H., Farsani, D. M., Salehi, A., & Noorbakhsh, M. (2019). Comparison of the sedation quality of etomidate, propofol, and midazolam in combination with fentanyl during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 9(2).
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The experimental data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.